In the world of MMA, few debates ignite as much passion as comparing the dominance of Khabib Nurmagomedov and Islam Makhachev. But here's where it gets controversial: Dustin Poirier, a fighter who’s faced both legends, has weighed in—and his insights might just challenge everything you thought you knew. Before stepping away from the Octagon earlier this year, Poirier shared the ring with some of the sport’s greatest names, including Max Holloway, Justin Gaethje, and the two Dagestani powerhouses. Yet, it was his encounters with Nurmagomedov and Makhachev that left an indelible mark on his career.
Poirier’s quest for the undisputed lightweight title ended in defeat against both fighters. In 2019, Nurmagomedov secured a third-round submission victory, while Makhachev forced Poirier to tap out at UFC 302 five years later—marking the Louisianan’s final bid for the 155-pound crown. And this is the part most people miss: After that grueling battle in Newark, Poirier found himself in a unique position to compare the two fighters, having experienced their styles firsthand.
In a candid conversation with Ariel Helwani following UFC 302, Poirier reflected on his bouts with both Nurmagomedov and his protégé. Despite Makhachev’s recent ventures into higher weight classes, Poirier declared Nurmagomedov the physically stronger of the two. But why? Poirier explained, ‘Takedowns are different. Pressure is similar.’ He noted that Makhachev relies heavily on upper-body techniques and clinching, while Nurmagomedov favors lower shots. ‘Khabib is stronger, physically stronger,’ Poirier asserted. ‘Islam’s squeeze was incredible, like a vice grip, but Khabib’s strength was overwhelming.’
Here’s where the debate heats up: While Poirier’s perspective is invaluable, others, like Jack Della Maddalena, argue that Makhachev has evolved beyond his mentor. Speaking on Israel Adesanya’s podcast, Della Maddalena highlighted three key advantages Makhachev holds over Nurmagomedov: improved striking, a more diverse arsenal of techniques, and a calmer, less rushed approach. He even suggested that Makhachev’s move to welterweight could put him in even better shape. But is this evolution enough to surpass the legend?
This comparison isn’t just about strength or technique—it’s about legacy. Nurmagomedov’s undefeated record and dominance cemented his place in MMA history, but Makhachev’s ongoing rise raises questions: Can he surpass his mentor? Or will Nurmagomedov’s shadow remain unchallenged? What do you think? Does Poirier’s firsthand experience settle the debate, or does Makhachev’s growth make him the superior fighter? Let us know in the comments—this is one discussion you won’t want to miss!
