The Marcus Rashford saga at Barcelona has sparked intense debate, with accusations of double standards and a lack of consistency in disciplinary actions. After being dropped from the team for lateness, some have questioned why Lamine Yamal wasn't similarly punished. But here's where it gets controversial... Barcelona manager Hansi Flick has firmly denied these claims, asserting his authority over discipline. Despite the speculation, Flick maintains that the club's hierarchy didn't force him to select Yamal for the Champions League loss. And this is the part most people miss... While Rashford faced the consequences of his actions, Yamal's handling of the situation has raised questions about fairness. But is it really a case of double standards, or are there other factors at play? As the saga unfolds, it's clear that the club's disciplinary approach is under scrutiny. So, what do you think? Is it fair to compare the two situations? Or are there other factors that we're missing? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
